The Chinvat Bridge (Avestan language: 𐬗𐬌𐬥𐬬𐬀𐬙𐬋 𐬞𐬈𐬭𐬈𐬙𐬏𐬨 Cinvatô Peretûm, "bridge of judgement" or "beam-shaped bridge") or the Bridge of the Requiter in Zoroastrianism is the sifting bridge, which separates the world of the living from the world of the dead. All souls must cross the bridge upon death. The bridge is guarded by two four-eyed dogs, described in the Videvdat (Vendidad) 13,9 as 'spâna pəšu.pâna' ("two bridge-guarding dogs").Dirven, Lucinda. "My Lord with his Dogs. Continuity and Change in the Cult of Nergal in Parthian Mesopotamia". In: Edessa in hellenistisch-römischer Zeit: Religion, Kultur und Politik zwischen Ost und West. Beiträge des internationalen Edessa-Symposiums in Halle an der Saale, 14–17. Juli 2005, eds. Lutz Greisiger, Claudia Rammelt and Jürgen Tubach. Beiruter Texte und Studien 116. Beirut/Würzburg: Ergon Verlag. 2009. pp. 66-67 (also footnote nr. 95). Foltz, Richard. "Zoroastrian Attitudes toward Animals". In: Society and Animals 18 (2010). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill. 2010. p. 371.
The Bridge's appearance varies depending on the observer's asha, or righteousness. As related in the text known as the Bundahishn, if a person has been wicked, the bridge will appear narrow and the demon Chinnaphapast will emerge and drag their soul into the Duzakh (the House of Lies), a place of eternal punishment and suffering similar to the concept of Hell. If a person's good thoughts, words and deeds in life are many, the bridge will be wide enough to cross, and the Daena, a spirit representing revelation, will appear and lead the soul into Garo Demana (the House of Song). Those souls that successfully cross the bridge are united with Ahura Mazda.
Often, the Chinvat Bridge is identified with the rainbow, or with the Milky Way galaxy, such as in Professor C.P. Tiele's "History of Religion ".Tiele, C.P. History of Religion. London and Boston, 1877: p. 177. However, other scholars such as C.F. Keary and Ferdinand Justi disagree with this interpretation, citing descriptions of the Chinvat Bridge as straight upward, rather than curvilinear.C. F. Keary, Primitive Belief. Lond., 1882: p. 292.Rawlinson, The Seven Great Monarchies of the Ancient Eastern World: Parthia and Sassania. Gorgias Press LLC, 2002.
Three divinities are thought to be guardians of the Chinvat Bridge: Sraosha (Conscience), Mithra (Covenant) and Rashnu (Justice).
Alternate names for this bridge include Chinwad, Cinvat, Chinvar or Chinavat.
The last gateway to Heaven and Hell; As-Sirāt in Islam is similar to concept of Chinvat.
The Vendidad also describes the Chinvat Bridge in fargard 19.
|
|
American poet Charles Olson refers to the Chinvat Bridge ("Cinvat" in his reading) in his epic, The Maximus Poems; a work which deals with Avestan mythology, among numerous others.
In Zoroastrian hymns, a passage called "Chinovat Perito" is mentioned. This word consists of two parts: "Chin," meaning "how," and "Perito," meaning "passage." Therefore, this word would serve as a gateway to how to live,in this vision, there is no mention of the materiality of such a passage for the soul through the past. Perhaps a time will come when every human being will consult their conscience and question it after every behavior or action they have undertaken.
The priests of the Sassanid era followed the culture of others who had arrived in Iran at that time, adapting and harmonizing beliefs about heaven, hell, the afterlife, and their history in order to better understand and comprehend the material life of the time for Iranian Zoroastrians,thus, in Zoroaster's thought, heaven and hell, initiated by a monk named Arday Viraz, led to the writing of the Pahlavi poem " Book of Arda Viraf," and took on a different form.
The rewards and punishments of deceased human bodies were also predicted. Heaven and Hell are given paths and roads (in a short Avesta text called the Batit), and the Chinvad Pass is also described as a bridge (wide and wide for the righteous, thin as hair for the sinners) that a departing soul must cross under special circumstances to reach Heaven or be led to Hell.
Such a definition, which follows a different culture, is clearly incorrect and inconsistent with the wise vision of Ashura Zoroaster. A religion that was transformed and developed by the ideas of the priests of that time, sometimes out of necessity or ignorance, even though it also used the name Zoroaster, undoubtedly the recommendations and visions of that time sometimes conflicted with the true vision of the teacher of truth and wisdom, Ashura Zoroaster, mentioned in his poems (the Gathas).
|
|